Volume IX, Issue No.1
January, 2001
In
this Issue: Rituals, Circles and Practice Runs:
Strategies for Literacy
Expeditionary Literacy Practices
Many Expeditionary Learning teachers have found that they can teach
literacy through an expedition by developing projects that require
reading, writing, and oral presentations, and through literature circles,
interactive reading journals, and Socratic seminars that feature texts
relevant to the expedition and useful for the projects. The common thread
connecting the projects and the other literacy work is careful study of
the reading comprehension strategies described by Ellin Keene and Susan
Zimmerman in their book Mosaic of Thought (1997). Barbara Waxman, an
Expeditionary Learning school designer, asks Kathleen McHugh to describe
how she used these strategies in an expedition with her sixth, seventh,
and eighth graders at the Rocky Mountain School of Expeditionary Learning
Outward Bound in Denver, Colorado.
Waxman: How do you begin to weave literacy into your expedition?
McHugh: We start with the portfolio requirements and plan back from there.
We know we have to do a creative fiction piece, a historical, cultural,
geographical investigation, and a literary analysis. In addition, I always
keep the reading comprehension strategies Keene describes in mind, and
think about text in terms of how I can teach and use those strategies.
Waxman: So the reading comprehension strategies are your reading
curriculum.
McHugh: Right.
Waxman: Why don't you describe your World War II expedition.
McHugh: We studied World War II from multiple perspectives. We started
with a museum immersion, because we wanted the students to create their
own museum of World War II as their final project. We also visited elders
and wrote their memoirs. At the same time, students were reading memoirs
from people who lived during World War II, like American soldiers,
Holocaust survivors, Japanese-Americans internees, and many others. I also
read aloud picture books that were memoirs such as, Bearing Witness and
Daniel's Story.
After we wrote the memoirs, students started reading their historical
fiction novels in literature circles. Students recommended some of the
titles, and I research the others We have to have a lot of choices,
because in a sixth- seventh- and eighth-grade class, I had so many
different reading levels. Some sixth graders wanted to read Schindler's
List and some eighth graders wanted to read Under a Blood Red Sun.
Literature Circles
McHugh: I like to start the literature circle with student choice.
Choosing the book is a two or three day process. It's a big, exciting
event. They had eight to ten novels to choose from, and I read a page or
two of each one, and discuss it and really pump them up.
Waxman: It sounds like you make a ritual out of this. You make this
dramatic.
McHugh: Yes. It's nice to have the ritual to begin the literature circles.
Literature circles met two times a week. There would be six to eight going
on at the same time in the classroom, each with a different novel. After
three to four weeks, they would finish the novel and switch to another
novel. The expedition went from September until February, and during that
time, students read between four and five novels. Every group worked on
their own book, but once in a while, we stopped and had book shares and
found out what people thought about the other books. That is how students
discovered what they wanted to read next.
Waxman: Do students stay with the same literature circle or do they rotate?
McHugh: For the most part they end up staying the same, because they
become a cohesive group. I really like building the culture of the
literature circle as a tight group that enjoys talking about books and
delving into them. It's about opening up, and sharing your feelings and
your connections with books.
Waxman: How did you prepare them for their literature circle meetings?
McHugh: I used to do literature circles in a more loosey-goosey fashion. I
would say, "Today talk about the text to self connections that you had in
your books?" They would get together and talk about them, and I'd say,
"Jot down some notes that you can turn in." But I wasn't really hard-core
about it. I found that I needed to make my students more accountable, and
that we'd all be better off for it. I started to give students jobs and
roles. Each group had a discussion director, someone who would talk about
visual images, someone who would pick a passage for everyone to talk about.
Waxman: Oh, you mean the roles described by Harvey Daniels in Literature
Circles.
McHugh: Yes. Literature circles can be overwhelming as a teacher, because
you put them into groups and then you don't know if they're doing anything
or
what they're getting out of it. It's even more frightening when you have
them all reading different books. That is why you really need
accountability. You need them to have some prep work, like a ticket to
participate. They need to do work before they come to the literature
circle, during the literature circle, and at the end to prove that their
group was purposeful.
Before I read Mosaic of Thought and became aware of reading strategies, I
used to come up with the discussion questions for literature circle. That
never worked as well as when the students develop their own questions. Of
course, you need to teach them how to develop good questions, give them
guidelines and support, but the conversation is so much richer as soon as
they own it.
I started having students come up with three questions they wanted to
discuss in literature circle. They would come up with the most fabulous
things, and it would be aligned with the strategies. For example, if we
were working on the strategy of making connections, for homework I would
ask them to highlight text to world connections to discuss with the group,
and come up with three discussion questions about connections. Their
questions were just so much better than mine. I think when you're
teaching, you're often trying to see if they actually did the reading, so
you ask questions that make sure they finished their homework. But the
students come up with questions that get at the deeper meaning.
Waxman: What if the students are asking trivial questions? How do they
know how to ask good questions?
McHugh: I don't think they ask trivial questions. Maybe it's because of
all the class time we spend on modeling. Before we even got to the point
where we would do that in literature circles, we did training days where
we went through all the different aspects of the literature circles. All
the students practiced doing everything.
We spent a lot of time on questioning, because when I first started with
this class, they seemed to be afraid to ask questions. They thought they
would look dumb if they didn't know the answer. I had to build questioning
up, convey that it was highly intellectual, that it revealed deep thinking
and engagement. It became something they wanted to do, but we still have
to practice it. We would ask questions, and then analyze the questions. We
wouldn't even use them for discussion, but analyze whether or not they
would lead to a good discussion, or whether they would fizzle off. We had
a week of just practicing literature circle. That may seem like overkill,
but I think that prep work with students is essential.
| READING COMPREHENSION STRATEGIES
In their book Mosaic of Thought (1997), Ellin Keene and Susan Zimmerman
describe the seven strategies that proficient readers use to comprehend
text:
- Activating relevant, prior knowledge (schema)
- Text to self connections
- Text to world connections
- Text to text connections
- Determining the most important ideas and themes in the text
- Asking questions
- Creating visual and other sensory images
- Drawing inferences
- Retelling or synthesizing
- Utilizing "fix-up" strategies to repair comprehension
|
Teaching the Strategies
Waxman: Did you introduce the strategies during a think-aloud mini-lesson?
McHugh: Right. For example, one day I did a think-aloud on Devil's
Arithmetic. I thought aloud, and I started getting a lot of text to self
and text to world connections. There were also many text to text
connections to literature circle books like Schindler's List and Night.
The students started to make a lot of connections too. We had a big piece
of chart paper up on the wall in the reading area where we recorded our
connections. The paper had the names of our books on the top and three
columns, one for text to self, one for text to world, and one for text to
text. I try to align the work we do with one strategy, like inferring, so
that we work on it in read alouds, in mini-lessons, in literature circles,
and in homework.
Waxman: How did you know what strategies they needed next?
McHugh: You have to have a lot of dialogue, either through speaking or
writing. I think that all K through 12 teachers need to read aloud every
day, and have a dialogue with students when they're reading aloud. You
hear so much about what students understand, what kind of questions they
have, and where they're tripping over comprehension.
But students don't just read aloud, they also read alone during homework
and silent reading time, so I had to have a couple of different ways to
spark dialogue. I liked to walk around the room during silent reading and
have one-on-one reading conferences. I also used reading journals. Reading
journals were most successful for me when I wrote back and forth to the
students once every two weeks. In their journals, they had to write me a
letter about what they were thinking, and that provided me with great
examples of student thinking. It is so valuable to read children's
thoughts about books.
They really appreciated being able to write to me. It was also a safe
place to say, "I feel like I'm having a hard time understanding this."
That's when you can figure out, what kind of strategies might help this
student. Very often you find that if you help a couple of students, you
will help all of them. If a student's having a hard time determining
importance, maybe we should all have a mini-lesson on determining
importance.
| REFLECTIONS ON THE WRITING PROCESS
As I researched, I became engrossed in my topic, and I knew that I could
write a great paper. I had so many ideas of how to portray my information.
I thought and thought. I remembered the book, Hiroshima, which we had just
read. The writing style was different than most books, because the author
jumps back and forth between characters instead of following one the whole
time. I decided that this particular style would be perfect for my story,
because I had characters that would not know each other before the war. I
knew that I could start the story during the war, but I wanted it to start
before. I wanted to give background of Germany right before the war, and
my three main characters, Josef Mengele, Ana and Sara (the twins). I then
decided that I would go from one character's story to the others, to show
the differences in their life styles. Then, they would meet up at
Auschwitz. I made a character outline that described who each character
was, and how they related to my story. Before I even started writing the
actual paper, I could tell it would be complex, with many stories and
events to tell.
|
Engaging with Non-Fiction
Waxman: How do you help kids read complex nonfiction?
McHugh: I love using the strategies with nonfiction work because once
students see modeling of the strategies with fiction, using them with
nonfiction comes quite naturally. In the World War II expedition, I gave
students a lot of nonfiction to read because of our research project. I
wanted to expose the kids to a wide variety of writing on World War II.
The challenge was that the good texts tend to be on a higher level. But,
if you give the students the support they need, they can read those more
complex texts.
The key for me as a teacher has been learning not to just hand them a text
and say, "I want you to read this and then write a paragraph about it and
we can discuss it tomorrow." I had to learn that students need more
support. That's when the strategies became so important. Whenever a
student receives a nonfiction text from me, they always have an activity
that they have to do to engage with it. For instance, I might ask them to
code the text. By coding, I mean writing all over the text, underlining
it, circling words, writing notes in the margins. We decide together how
we're going to code it. For example, we might decide to code for the
strategy of determining importance.
I find that when you just give students things to read and ask them to
read it, not all the students will do it. But if you give them something
to read, give them the tools to read it, show them how they can get the
most out of it, put in place an accountability factor by saying they will
have to talk about it afterwards, usually everyone reads the text.
Waxman: It sounds like you weren't ever teaching reading or writing
strategies for the sake of teaching strategies. It was always for the sake
of learning more about the expedition.
McHugh: Right. It is so wonderful with these strategies, because they help
students connect things so well. They use them for a purpose.
Motivating High School Students to Read
By Michelle Brantley
Last year I found myself in an interesting position. Every morning I
worked for my mother at her preschool, Little House Enrichment Center, and
every afternoon, I taught twelfth graders at Middle College High School in
Memphis.
When I worked at the preschool, I frequently had the opportunity to teach
the four and five year old groups who were "getting ready for big school,"
as they so proudly stated. In crafting age appropriate curriculum for
these children, we focused on making sure their environment was rich in
literacy and that the children were immersed in the words and worlds of
books. The motivation our children had to read and hear stories excited
me; they viewed reading as a special prize, and longed to be read to story
after story after story.
As each morning came to an end, I began the process of shifting gears,
both physically and mentally. High school students had been my first love,
and I welcomed the challenge of motivating these students to read in the
same way that the preschoolers were motivated. For those of us who work
with high school students, we often ponder what happens between later
elementary and high school that moves children from abundant wonder and
curiosity to apathy and boredom, especially when it comes to reading. How
many of us would be rich if we had a dollar for every time a teenager said
he or she did not like to read?
Last year I was determined to reunite my high school students' interest in
reading. I wanted their senior year to be about more than Beowulf,
Macbeth, and an inquiry paper. I wanted to find a novel that would mirror my
students' experiences and echo their collective voice. I chose Makes Me
Wanna Holler by Nathan McCall. This national bestseller is the raw but
true story of the author's indirect journey to college and a successful
career as a journalist. McCall is very frank in talking about the darker
sides of his youth. He, like many African American men, struggled with
finding his place in a world that he viewed as the antithesis of himself.
McCall's description of his life offers readers some pills that are hard
to swallow, like the realities of racism and sexism. McCall eventually
goes to jail for theft, and it is prison that he begins to re-examine his
trouble youth and vows to make positive changes. The text gives a truthful
testimony to the power of education to transform a wayward life, for it is
education that brings McCall from prison to a job at the Washington Post
and a professorship at Emory University.
I knew that McCall's coming of age experiences would ring true to my
students. I knew they would be able to see themselves directly or
indirectly in McCall's work. And I knew this was the first essential step
in motivating them to read: choosing a text that said to them their
teacher understood and respected who they were and where they were. As
educators, we subscribe to a host of scholarly journals and education
weeklies, but how often do we pick up Vibe or Source magazine, which are
music publications whose readership is predominantly between fourteen and
twenty five?
Motivation to read has to begin with student interest, and we as educators
must be deliberate in learning what our students' interests are. One of my
former students, April Blair said it best in a article featured in the
school newspaper, "Just as adults trust teens to read Shakespeare and
other celebrated classics, people should trust kids to read Makes Me Wanna
Holler. . . Let students read what they want; reading contemporary
literature that deals with real life situations has the same value as
reading [the] classics." As April's comment clearly states, in order to
have students, particularly unmotivated students, analyze text for it
deeper meanings or have the skills to conduct meaningful research, we have
to first engage them in text that speaks to them.
However, it does not stop there. The most effective literacy strategies I
have used with my high school students are the same one many elementary
teachers use. For instance, elementary school teachers give time and
attention to pre-reading strategies because they are often creating schema
rather than simply activating schema. As a high school teacher, I seldom
placed emphasis on creating the foundation that students needed in order
to enter text. But my students still needed to practice the skills of
understanding context and references. I realized I had to give them more
support.
Before my students touched Makes Me Wanna Holler, I spent time focusing on
developing schema. We listened to and analyzed Marvin Gaye's songs, which
inspired McCall's title and images and which were popular among my
students. We also connected the messages in Gaye's lyrics to the messages
found in many socially conscious rap lyrics. We looked at the music as a
social and historical commentary of the 80s and 90s, the time period of
the text. The music was a strong factor in motivating students to read
because they love music and because they were given the chance to learn
through music. The music also strengthened the bond of my classes; we were
singing together, rapping together, but still learning.
Literature circles, interactive reading journals, and read and think
alouds within reader's/ writer's workshops also helped my students gain
deeper meaning and understanding of the text. Given the variety of reading
levels represented in my class, using think alouds was most important. My
students needed to see how I arrived at conclusions or the thinking behind
some of my written responses to text. I also challenged my students to
share their process of understanding text metacognitively with each other.
Too often these strategies are left behind in elementary school, but I
found them very valuable in supporting literacy in my high school class,
especially in terms of giving lower readers support. I also found that
when it was time for the senior inquiry paper, students had more tools in
place to conduct research. They were required to work with difficult text,
but it was less of a challenge because using many of the strategies they
needed had become almost second nature.
As a high school teacher, I admit that I often viewed the worlds of
preschool and elementary far removed from my world. However, working with
preschoolers reminded me that even in unmotivated high school students
there remains a natural joy in reading; it may simply be lying dormant.
Tapping into student interest is key in awakening the motivation. In
addition to student interest, paying close attention to how elementary
teachers equip students with strategies helped me to deepen literacy
instruction within my own classroom. These are certainly not all of the
answers, but definitely a good starting point.
Michelle Brantley is an Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound school
designer. To read more about her experience teaching McCall's book, read
her chapter in the Expeditionary Learning book, Literacy All Day Long.
The Expeditionary Teaching of Literacy
By Barbara Waxman
Over the last several years, Expeditionary Learning has embarked on a
quest to integrate the teaching of literacy into expeditions. Could
literacy teaching reflect the practice and values of Expeditionary
Learning? Could the teaching of literacy be improved in the same way that
Expeditionary Learning practices elevate other aspects of teaching?
Expeditionary Learning brings meaning and context to learning by studying
a topic in depth, and by searching for implications of that topic in the
community, in history, and in our own lives. It is also about building
community, fostering empathy and compassion, and bringing a sense of
adventure and challenge into as well as out of the classroom.
Luckily, there are experts and resources such as Ellin Keene, Stephanie
Harvey, and The Strategic Literacy Initiative, who suggest ways of
teaching literacy that are congruent with our model. Expeditionary
Learning embraces these practices, and adds context and meaning by
infusing them into expeditions which, in turn, create authentic reasons to
read and write.
Expeditions are built around the idea that learning happens best when
there is emotion. Literature has the power to engage our emotions and make
learning come alive. Choosing a powerful novel, biography, or narrative
can enrich and center an expedition by raising moral issues and multiple
perspectives, and by hooking students into dilemmas and controversies as
only good fiction or narrative can. The well-chosen novel or narrative or
biography gives students a chance to identify with the main characters,
live inside the expedition's theme, and develop imaginative compassion for
another time and place. This piece of literature becomes the anchor text
for an expedition, and is used for a read-aloud.For an expedition on
industrialization, how much easier it is to learn about factory workers
and the beginning of the union movement when it's presented in a narrative
such as Lyddie by Katherine Paterson, where we can identify with the
plight of a young garment worker in the 1860's.
Expeditionary Learning students come to expect that intimacy and
compassion will characterize their time in school. The Readers' Workshop
is a structure that can promote both intimacy and literacy. (See Literacy
All Day Long for descriptions of the workshop) The workshop begins with a
mini-lesson where the teacher explicitly shows how to use a reading
comprehension or decoding strategy. Students practice that strategy
individually, in pairs or in small groups, helping each other to pay
closer attention, and to realize how social the construction of meaning
is. Finally, the class comes back together to share how they used the
strategy, to discuss any problems, and to reflect on how the strategy
helped them understand what they were reading. Asking students to share
their own experiences and connections and strategies with each other
allows intimacy to flow throughout the classroom. This sharing creates an
intimate circle of belonging, trust, and imaginative compassion
The think-aloud is a terrific instructional practice for the mini-lesson
portion of the workshop. Not only does it help students become conscious
of successful reading strategies, but it also reinforces an expeditionary
classroom culture. In a think-aloud, the teacher makes her thinking
visible and shows how she uses a strategy to understand a piece of text.
It is the place where the teacher shares her life experiences and
connections. In this way, the teacher models not only a strategy such as
making connections, she also models her own humanity. When teachers share
their own thinking, emotions, and memories, students are drawn into a
tighter web.
Teaching reading in this way involves adventure, exploration, and
character development for the teacher herself. In order to prepare
think-alouds, teachers must explore their own ways of reading and
understanding, as they make conscious their own reading strategies. Doing
think-alouds, responding to reading journals, forming literature circles
-all these require that teachers practice, consult with colleagues, and
reflect, in order to improve these instructional practices.
This explicit, conscious exploration of each facet of reading is also the
way to address Lisa Delft's (1995) famous concern about progressive
education in that it assumes students come in either knowing a great deal
about print and meaning-making, or that they will just pick it up on their
own by being in a print-rich environment. Teaching literacy in an
expeditionary way means teachers are actively finding out what students
know and do not know, and are building lessons based on that information.
It also means forming flexible groups to address specific needs and
conferring with individual students to provide more guided assistance. It
is worthy of note that both reading researchers and Outward Bound
instructors use the same phrase for this kind of teacher assistance - 'The
guided release of responsibility' and similar metaphors n such as teaching
a child to ride a bike, first by modeling, then providing lots of
assistance and coaching, and then gradually backing away and letting the
child take off.
Approaching reading in this manner helps us hook the smaller picture of
literacy learning to the bigger picture of Expeditionary Learning.
Connecting the strategies taught during the reading workshop to other
aspects of the expedition, such as fieldwork, or a writing project, helps
make learning feel cohesive. Teaching literacy through workshops, sharing
our own reading processes with students, finding texts that illuminate
expedition themes-all these techniques create a way to do Expeditionary
Learning all the time.
| SNAPSHOT OF A READING COMMUNITY
by Barbara Waxman
The sixth graders crowded around to see the pictures in the book that I
brought in. I told them they had two tasks: try and make sense of the
book, and think about how they were making sense of the book. I read the
book, Voices in the Park by Anthony Brown, through once, and asked them
what they noticed. Tentatively, a few students offered their thoughts. I
read the book again, stopping after every page this time, to ask what they
noticed. This time, every student participated. After I finished reading,
an animated discussion ensued about their observations.
"So, how did you make sense of the book?" I asked. One student said, "I
didn't understand it the first time, but then you reread it, and that
really helped." "Why did that help?" I asked. "Well, you get more out of
something when you reread; you notice more and it starts to make more
sense." Another student said, "It really helped to hear what other people
were noticing. Then I started to notice more, too." Other students began
to chime in: "We thought about other books that we've read." "Just talking
together helped." "We had lots of questions." "We thought about how stuff
that happened in the book happened to us, too."
I put the book down and asked them to once again look at all they had
noticed about the book. Then I posed this question: "So what was the big
idea in this book? If you had just a word or two, or a phrase to describe
it, what would you say?" I paused for a minute to give the students time
to think. After a minute, I asked them to turn to a neighbor and discuss
each other's thoughts. Each child excitedly offered their ideas, and a few
pairs argued heatedly. Once the conversations died down, I asked them to
share their thoughts with the whole class. After a few comments, one
child, in the back of the room said, "It's all about perspective. Don't
you see? Each character sees the same event in a different way." The other
children nodded solemnly, and the teacher and I exchanged a thrilled look.
One child said, "I could write a story like that. I know, you could read
it when you come back."
|
Barbara Waxman is an Expeditionary Learning school designer in based in
Seattle, Washington.
Book Review: Literacy with an Attitude
by Patrick Finn
Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999
By Roslyn Blache
Can it be true that we Texas educators are not educating students to be
literate? Are we not empowering students to be lifelong learners? Are we
widening the gap between those who have power and those who are seeking to
obtain it? The 2000 RAND study of Texas education found that the gap
between black and white students' literacy has increased from 1994-1998.
One possible cause is the pressure to raise test scores. Teachers in
low-performing schools report spending more time on test preparation than
teachers in high performing schools. Often, these low-performing schools
include large populations of low-income and minority students. Seeking
some answers to this perplexing situation, I began reading Literacy with
an Attitude.
In his book, Finn asserts there are two kinds of literacy education
available in schools today. First, there is empowering education, which
leads to powerful literacy, the kind of literacy that leads to positions
of power and authority. Second, there is domesticating education, which
leads to functional literacy, literacy that makes a person productive and
dependable, but not troublesome. It is this second kind of education, Finn
believes, that is fostered upon the working class, and to some extent, the
middle class.
Working class children are denied access to powerful literacy because
powerful literacy can assist the disenfranchised in their struggle for
justice. Finn arrives at this conclusion after considering his own
background as a working class child, and judging his own teaching and the
teaching of his colleagues in New York. He realized that those teachers
who were deemed successful were those who were teaching students to do as
they were told, not teaching students to think. After researching the work
of Paulo Freire, a professor at the University of Recife (Brazil), Finn
understood that powerful literacy for the working class would be dangerous
to the status quo.
Finn turns to Jean Anyon's study of schools in northern New Jersey to see
how schools distribute powerful literacy. Anyon found in the schools she
studied that education could be classified into four distinct categories:
executive elite, affluent professional, middle class and working class.
The two that were most disparate were, of course, the executive elite and
the working class.
These two categories had their own identifiable teaching strategies. The
majority of teachers working with working class students presented
segmented facts and made little attempt to connect these facts to
students' lives, environment, or broader context. Students learned that
following prescribed steps was more important than whether the answers
were right or wrong, and they were rarely allowed to participate in
lessons that required them to evaluate anything or make decisions.
In contrast, knowledge in the executive elite school was academic,
intellectual, and rigorous. Teachers taught more difficult concepts and
valued reasoning and problem solving. These schools held up the
rationality and logic of mathematics as the model for correct and ethical
thinking. Lessons geared to understanding the students' environment, the
economy, and other essential systems were an integral part of the
learning. A direct correlation could be made between the skill and habits
these students were expected to achieve and the strategies their teachers
employed to teach them.
If this all sounds hopeless, do not despair. Finn assures that educators
can use strategies to address these deficiencies and help students acquire
the most powerful form of literacy. Finn discusses four levels of
literacy. The lowest level, "performance level," is the ability to "sound
out" words and turn sentences that are typical informal face-to-face
conversation into writing. The second level, or "functional level," is
when the students demonstrate the ability to meet the reading and writing
demands of an average day of an average person. The next level is the
"informational level," the ability to read and absorb the kind of
knowledge that is associated with the school-writing reports,
examinations. The highest level of literacy, "powerful literacy," involves
creativity and reason-the ability to evaluate, analyze, and synthesize
what is read. Powerful literacy, if utilized, can become a tool for
liberation and justice for all students. Consider the use of the essay,
the writings of Ghandi, the speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr.
Patrick Finn believes we can educate all students for "powerful literacy."
Literacy with an Attitude has several directives that could bring justice
to our schools. He suggests that students need authentic experiences that
are challenging, focused on issues of concern in their communities,
utilize their creativity, are geared to their interests, include time to
reflect, include time to critique their work, and requires them to use
their initiative and inquisitiveness. The community and parents need to
collaborate to insure that all students are educated for powerful
literacy. Does any of this sound familiar? If you work in an Expeditionary
Learning school, these should all be goals you are working toward and/or
are achieving already.
Roslyn Blache is an Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound school designer
based in San Antonio, Texas.
The Fieldwork Archive
|