What is ELS?

Our Approach

Professional Development

We Can Help You

See Our Results

Support Expeditionary Learning

Our Publications
 • Fieldwork Articles
 • Our Books
 • Recommended Reading

Aprendizaje Expedicionario en Español


The Web- the newsletter of expeditionary learning outward bound

Volume IX, Issue No.1
January, 2001

In this Issue: Rituals, Circles and Practice Runs: Strategies for Literacy


Expeditionary Literacy Practices

Many Expeditionary Learning teachers have found that they can teach literacy through an expedition by developing projects that require reading, writing, and oral presentations, and through literature circles, interactive reading journals, and Socratic seminars that feature texts relevant to the expedition and useful for the projects. The common thread connecting the projects and the other literacy work is careful study of the reading comprehension strategies described by Ellin Keene and Susan Zimmerman in their book Mosaic of Thought (1997). Barbara Waxman, an Expeditionary Learning school designer, asks Kathleen McHugh to describe how she used these strategies in an expedition with her sixth, seventh, and eighth graders at the Rocky Mountain School of Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound in Denver, Colorado.

Waxman: How do you begin to weave literacy into your expedition?

McHugh: We start with the portfolio requirements and plan back from there. We know we have to do a creative fiction piece, a historical, cultural, geographical investigation, and a literary analysis. In addition, I always keep the reading comprehension strategies Keene describes in mind, and think about text in terms of how I can teach and use those strategies.

Waxman: So the reading comprehension strategies are your reading curriculum.

McHugh: Right.

Waxman: Why don't you describe your World War II expedition.

McHugh: We studied World War II from multiple perspectives. We started with a museum immersion, because we wanted the students to create their own museum of World War II as their final project. We also visited elders and wrote their memoirs. At the same time, students were reading memoirs from people who lived during World War II, like American soldiers, Holocaust survivors, Japanese-Americans internees, and many others. I also read aloud picture books that were memoirs such as, Bearing Witness and Daniel's Story.

After we wrote the memoirs, students started reading their historical fiction novels in literature circles. Students recommended some of the titles, and I research the others We have to have a lot of choices, because in a sixth- seventh- and eighth-grade class, I had so many different reading levels. Some sixth graders wanted to read Schindler's List and some eighth graders wanted to read Under a Blood Red Sun.

Literature Circles

McHugh: I like to start the literature circle with student choice. Choosing the book is a two or three day process. It's a big, exciting event. They had eight to ten novels to choose from, and I read a page or two of each one, and discuss it and really pump them up.

Waxman: It sounds like you make a ritual out of this. You make this dramatic.

McHugh: Yes. It's nice to have the ritual to begin the literature circles. Literature circles met two times a week. There would be six to eight going on at the same time in the classroom, each with a different novel. After three to four weeks, they would finish the novel and switch to another novel. The expedition went from September until February, and during that time, students read between four and five novels. Every group worked on their own book, but once in a while, we stopped and had book shares and found out what people thought about the other books. That is how students discovered what they wanted to read next.

Waxman: Do students stay with the same literature circle or do they rotate?

McHugh: For the most part they end up staying the same, because they become a cohesive group. I really like building the culture of the literature circle as a tight group that enjoys talking about books and delving into them. It's about opening up, and sharing your feelings and your connections with books.

Waxman: How did you prepare them for their literature circle meetings?

McHugh: I used to do literature circles in a more loosey-goosey fashion. I would say, "Today talk about the text to self connections that you had in your books?" They would get together and talk about them, and I'd say, "Jot down some notes that you can turn in." But I wasn't really hard-core about it. I found that I needed to make my students more accountable, and that we'd all be better off for it. I started to give students jobs and roles. Each group had a discussion director, someone who would talk about visual images, someone who would pick a passage for everyone to talk about.

Waxman: Oh, you mean the roles described by Harvey Daniels in Literature Circles.

McHugh: Yes. Literature circles can be overwhelming as a teacher, because you put them into groups and then you don't know if they're doing anything or what they're getting out of it. It's even more frightening when you have them all reading different books. That is why you really need accountability. You need them to have some prep work, like a ticket to participate. They need to do work before they come to the literature circle, during the literature circle, and at the end to prove that their group was purposeful.

Before I read Mosaic of Thought and became aware of reading strategies, I used to come up with the discussion questions for literature circle. That never worked as well as when the students develop their own questions. Of course, you need to teach them how to develop good questions, give them guidelines and support, but the conversation is so much richer as soon as they own it.

I started having students come up with three questions they wanted to discuss in literature circle. They would come up with the most fabulous things, and it would be aligned with the strategies. For example, if we were working on the strategy of making connections, for homework I would ask them to highlight text to world connections to discuss with the group, and come up with three discussion questions about connections. Their questions were just so much better than mine. I think when you're teaching, you're often trying to see if they actually did the reading, so you ask questions that make sure they finished their homework. But the students come up with questions that get at the deeper meaning.

Waxman: What if the students are asking trivial questions? How do they know how to ask good questions?

McHugh: I don't think they ask trivial questions. Maybe it's because of all the class time we spend on modeling. Before we even got to the point where we would do that in literature circles, we did training days where we went through all the different aspects of the literature circles. All the students practiced doing everything.

We spent a lot of time on questioning, because when I first started with this class, they seemed to be afraid to ask questions. They thought they would look dumb if they didn't know the answer. I had to build questioning up, convey that it was highly intellectual, that it revealed deep thinking and engagement. It became something they wanted to do, but we still have to practice it. We would ask questions, and then analyze the questions. We wouldn't even use them for discussion, but analyze whether or not they would lead to a good discussion, or whether they would fizzle off. We had a week of just practicing literature circle. That may seem like overkill, but I think that prep work with students is essential.

READING COMPREHENSION STRATEGIES

In their book Mosaic of Thought (1997), Ellin Keene and Susan Zimmerman describe the seven strategies that proficient readers use to comprehend text:

  • Activating relevant, prior knowledge (schema)
  • Text to self connections
  • Text to world connections
  • Text to text connections
  • Determining the most important ideas and themes in the text
  • Asking questions
  • Creating visual and other sensory images
  • Drawing inferences
  • Retelling or synthesizing
  • Utilizing "fix-up" strategies to repair comprehension

Teaching the Strategies

Waxman: Did you introduce the strategies during a think-aloud mini-lesson?

McHugh: Right. For example, one day I did a think-aloud on Devil's Arithmetic. I thought aloud, and I started getting a lot of text to self and text to world connections. There were also many text to text connections to literature circle books like Schindler's List and Night. The students started to make a lot of connections too. We had a big piece of chart paper up on the wall in the reading area where we recorded our connections. The paper had the names of our books on the top and three columns, one for text to self, one for text to world, and one for text to text. I try to align the work we do with one strategy, like inferring, so that we work on it in read alouds, in mini-lessons, in literature circles, and in homework.

Waxman: How did you know what strategies they needed next?

McHugh: You have to have a lot of dialogue, either through speaking or writing. I think that all K through 12 teachers need to read aloud every day, and have a dialogue with students when they're reading aloud. You hear so much about what students understand, what kind of questions they have, and where they're tripping over comprehension.

But students don't just read aloud, they also read alone during homework and silent reading time, so I had to have a couple of different ways to spark dialogue. I liked to walk around the room during silent reading and have one-on-one reading conferences. I also used reading journals. Reading journals were most successful for me when I wrote back and forth to the students once every two weeks. In their journals, they had to write me a letter about what they were thinking, and that provided me with great examples of student thinking. It is so valuable to read children's thoughts about books.

They really appreciated being able to write to me. It was also a safe place to say, "I feel like I'm having a hard time understanding this." That's when you can figure out, what kind of strategies might help this student. Very often you find that if you help a couple of students, you will help all of them. If a student's having a hard time determining importance, maybe we should all have a mini-lesson on determining importance.

REFLECTIONS ON THE WRITING PROCESS

As I researched, I became engrossed in my topic, and I knew that I could write a great paper. I had so many ideas of how to portray my information. I thought and thought. I remembered the book, Hiroshima, which we had just read. The writing style was different than most books, because the author jumps back and forth between characters instead of following one the whole time. I decided that this particular style would be perfect for my story, because I had characters that would not know each other before the war. I knew that I could start the story during the war, but I wanted it to start before. I wanted to give background of Germany right before the war, and my three main characters, Josef Mengele, Ana and Sara (the twins). I then decided that I would go from one character's story to the others, to show the differences in their life styles. Then, they would meet up at Auschwitz. I made a character outline that described who each character was, and how they related to my story. Before I even started writing the actual paper, I could tell it would be complex, with many stories and events to tell.

Engaging with Non-Fiction

Waxman: How do you help kids read complex nonfiction?

McHugh: I love using the strategies with nonfiction work because once students see modeling of the strategies with fiction, using them with nonfiction comes quite naturally. In the World War II expedition, I gave students a lot of nonfiction to read because of our research project. I wanted to expose the kids to a wide variety of writing on World War II. The challenge was that the good texts tend to be on a higher level. But, if you give the students the support they need, they can read those more complex texts.

The key for me as a teacher has been learning not to just hand them a text and say, "I want you to read this and then write a paragraph about it and we can discuss it tomorrow." I had to learn that students need more support. That's when the strategies became so important. Whenever a student receives a nonfiction text from me, they always have an activity that they have to do to engage with it. For instance, I might ask them to code the text. By coding, I mean writing all over the text, underlining it, circling words, writing notes in the margins. We decide together how we're going to code it. For example, we might decide to code for the strategy of determining importance.

I find that when you just give students things to read and ask them to read it, not all the students will do it. But if you give them something to read, give them the tools to read it, show them how they can get the most out of it, put in place an accountability factor by saying they will have to talk about it afterwards, usually everyone reads the text.

Waxman: It sounds like you weren't ever teaching reading or writing strategies for the sake of teaching strategies. It was always for the sake of learning more about the expedition.

McHugh: Right. It is so wonderful with these strategies, because they help students connect things so well. They use them for a purpose.


Motivating High School Students to Read

  By Michelle Brantley

Last year I found myself in an interesting position. Every morning I worked for my mother at her preschool, Little House Enrichment Center, and every afternoon, I taught twelfth graders at Middle College High School in Memphis.

When I worked at the preschool, I frequently had the opportunity to teach the four and five year old groups who were "getting ready for big school," as they so proudly stated. In crafting age appropriate curriculum for these children, we focused on making sure their environment was rich in literacy and that the children were immersed in the words and worlds of books. The motivation our children had to read and hear stories excited me; they viewed reading as a special prize, and longed to be read to story after story after story.

As each morning came to an end, I began the process of shifting gears, both physically and mentally. High school students had been my first love, and I welcomed the challenge of motivating these students to read in the same way that the preschoolers were motivated. For those of us who work with high school students, we often ponder what happens between later elementary and high school that moves children from abundant wonder and curiosity to apathy and boredom, especially when it comes to reading. How many of us would be rich if we had a dollar for every time a teenager said he or she did not like to read?

Last year I was determined to reunite my high school students' interest in reading. I wanted their senior year to be about more than Beowulf, Macbeth, and an inquiry paper. I wanted to find a novel that would mirror my students' experiences and echo their collective voice. I chose Makes Me Wanna Holler by Nathan McCall. This national bestseller is the raw but true story of the author's indirect journey to college and a successful career as a journalist. McCall is very frank in talking about the darker sides of his youth. He, like many African American men, struggled with finding his place in a world that he viewed as the antithesis of himself. McCall's description of his life offers readers some pills that are hard to swallow, like the realities of racism and sexism. McCall eventually goes to jail for theft, and it is prison that he begins to re-examine his trouble youth and vows to make positive changes. The text gives a truthful testimony to the power of education to transform a wayward life, for it is education that brings McCall from prison to a job at the Washington Post and a professorship at Emory University.

I knew that McCall's coming of age experiences would ring true to my students. I knew they would be able to see themselves directly or indirectly in McCall's work. And I knew this was the first essential step in motivating them to read: choosing a text that said to them their teacher understood and respected who they were and where they were. As educators, we subscribe to a host of scholarly journals and education weeklies, but how often do we pick up Vibe or Source magazine, which are music publications whose readership is predominantly between fourteen and twenty five?

Motivation to read has to begin with student interest, and we as educators must be deliberate in learning what our students' interests are. One of my former students, April Blair said it best in a article featured in the school newspaper, "Just as adults trust teens to read Shakespeare and other celebrated classics, people should trust kids to read Makes Me Wanna Holler. . . Let students read what they want; reading contemporary literature that deals with real life situations has the same value as reading [the] classics." As April's comment clearly states, in order to have students, particularly unmotivated students, analyze text for it deeper meanings or have the skills to conduct meaningful research, we have to first engage them in text that speaks to them.

However, it does not stop there. The most effective literacy strategies I have used with my high school students are the same one many elementary teachers use. For instance, elementary school teachers give time and attention to pre-reading strategies because they are often creating schema rather than simply activating schema. As a high school teacher, I seldom placed emphasis on creating the foundation that students needed in order to enter text. But my students still needed to practice the skills of understanding context and references. I realized I had to give them more support.

Before my students touched Makes Me Wanna Holler, I spent time focusing on developing schema. We listened to and analyzed Marvin Gaye's songs, which inspired McCall's title and images and which were popular among my students. We also connected the messages in Gaye's lyrics to the messages found in many socially conscious rap lyrics. We looked at the music as a social and historical commentary of the 80s and 90s, the time period of the text. The music was a strong factor in motivating students to read because they love music and because they were given the chance to learn through music. The music also strengthened the bond of my classes; we were singing together, rapping together, but still learning.

Literature circles, interactive reading journals, and read and think alouds within reader's/ writer's workshops also helped my students gain deeper meaning and understanding of the text. Given the variety of reading levels represented in my class, using think alouds was most important. My students needed to see how I arrived at conclusions or the thinking behind some of my written responses to text. I also challenged my students to share their process of understanding text metacognitively with each other.

Too often these strategies are left behind in elementary school, but I found them very valuable in supporting literacy in my high school class, especially in terms of giving lower readers support. I also found that when it was time for the senior inquiry paper, students had more tools in place to conduct research. They were required to work with difficult text, but it was less of a challenge because using many of the strategies they needed had become almost second nature.

As a high school teacher, I admit that I often viewed the worlds of preschool and elementary far removed from my world. However, working with preschoolers reminded me that even in unmotivated high school students there remains a natural joy in reading; it may simply be lying dormant. Tapping into student interest is key in awakening the motivation. In addition to student interest, paying close attention to how elementary teachers equip students with strategies helped me to deepen literacy instruction within my own classroom. These are certainly not all of the answers, but definitely a good starting point.

Michelle Brantley is an Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound school designer. To read more about her experience teaching McCall's book, read her chapter in the Expeditionary Learning book, Literacy All Day Long.


The Expeditionary Teaching of Literacy

By Barbara Waxman

Over the last several years, Expeditionary Learning has embarked on a quest to integrate the teaching of literacy into expeditions. Could literacy teaching reflect the practice and values of Expeditionary Learning? Could the teaching of literacy be improved in the same way that Expeditionary Learning practices elevate other aspects of teaching?

Expeditionary Learning brings meaning and context to learning by studying a topic in depth, and by searching for implications of that topic in the community, in history, and in our own lives. It is also about building community, fostering empathy and compassion, and bringing a sense of adventure and challenge into as well as out of the classroom.

Luckily, there are experts and resources such as Ellin Keene, Stephanie Harvey, and The Strategic Literacy Initiative, who suggest ways of teaching literacy that are congruent with our model. Expeditionary Learning embraces these practices, and adds context and meaning by infusing them into expeditions which, in turn, create authentic reasons to read and write.

Expeditions are built around the idea that learning happens best when there is emotion. Literature has the power to engage our emotions and make learning come alive. Choosing a powerful novel, biography, or narrative can enrich and center an expedition by raising moral issues and multiple perspectives, and by hooking students into dilemmas and controversies as only good fiction or narrative can. The well-chosen novel or narrative or biography gives students a chance to identify with the main characters, live inside the expedition's theme, and develop imaginative compassion for another time and place. This piece of literature becomes the anchor text for an expedition, and is used for a read-aloud.For an expedition on industrialization, how much easier it is to learn about factory workers and the beginning of the union movement when it's presented in a narrative such as Lyddie by Katherine Paterson, where we can identify with the plight of a young garment worker in the 1860's.

Expeditionary Learning students come to expect that intimacy and compassion will characterize their time in school. The Readers' Workshop is a structure that can promote both intimacy and literacy. (See Literacy All Day Long for descriptions of the workshop) The workshop begins with a mini-lesson where the teacher explicitly shows how to use a reading comprehension or decoding strategy. Students practice that strategy individually, in pairs or in small groups, helping each other to pay closer attention, and to realize how social the construction of meaning is. Finally, the class comes back together to share how they used the strategy, to discuss any problems, and to reflect on how the strategy helped them understand what they were reading. Asking students to share their own experiences and connections and strategies with each other allows intimacy to flow throughout the classroom. This sharing creates an intimate circle of belonging, trust, and imaginative compassion

The think-aloud is a terrific instructional practice for the mini-lesson portion of the workshop. Not only does it help students become conscious of successful reading strategies, but it also reinforces an expeditionary classroom culture. In a think-aloud, the teacher makes her thinking visible and shows how she uses a strategy to understand a piece of text. It is the place where the teacher shares her life experiences and connections. In this way, the teacher models not only a strategy such as making connections, she also models her own humanity. When teachers share their own thinking, emotions, and memories, students are drawn into a tighter web.

Teaching reading in this way involves adventure, exploration, and character development for the teacher herself. In order to prepare think-alouds, teachers must explore their own ways of reading and understanding, as they make conscious their own reading strategies. Doing think-alouds, responding to reading journals, forming literature circles -all these require that teachers practice, consult with colleagues, and reflect, in order to improve these instructional practices.

This explicit, conscious exploration of each facet of reading is also the way to address Lisa Delft's (1995) famous concern about progressive education in that it assumes students come in either knowing a great deal about print and meaning-making, or that they will just pick it up on their own by being in a print-rich environment. Teaching literacy in an expeditionary way means teachers are actively finding out what students know and do not know, and are building lessons based on that information. It also means forming flexible groups to address specific needs and conferring with individual students to provide more guided assistance. It is worthy of note that both reading researchers and Outward Bound instructors use the same phrase for this kind of teacher assistance - 'The guided release of responsibility' and similar metaphors n such as teaching a child to ride a bike, first by modeling, then providing lots of assistance and coaching, and then gradually backing away and letting the child take off.

Approaching reading in this manner helps us hook the smaller picture of literacy learning to the bigger picture of Expeditionary Learning. Connecting the strategies taught during the reading workshop to other aspects of the expedition, such as fieldwork, or a writing project, helps make learning feel cohesive. Teaching literacy through workshops, sharing our own reading processes with students, finding texts that illuminate expedition themes-all these techniques create a way to do Expeditionary Learning all the time.

SNAPSHOT OF A READING COMMUNITY

by Barbara Waxman

The sixth graders crowded around to see the pictures in the book that I brought in. I told them they had two tasks: try and make sense of the book, and think about how they were making sense of the book. I read the book, Voices in the Park by Anthony Brown, through once, and asked them what they noticed. Tentatively, a few students offered their thoughts. I read the book again, stopping after every page this time, to ask what they noticed. This time, every student participated. After I finished reading, an animated discussion ensued about their observations.

"So, how did you make sense of the book?" I asked. One student said, "I didn't understand it the first time, but then you reread it, and that really helped." "Why did that help?" I asked. "Well, you get more out of something when you reread; you notice more and it starts to make more sense." Another student said, "It really helped to hear what other people were noticing. Then I started to notice more, too." Other students began to chime in: "We thought about other books that we've read." "Just talking together helped." "We had lots of questions." "We thought about how stuff that happened in the book happened to us, too."

I put the book down and asked them to once again look at all they had noticed about the book. Then I posed this question: "So what was the big idea in this book? If you had just a word or two, or a phrase to describe it, what would you say?" I paused for a minute to give the students time to think. After a minute, I asked them to turn to a neighbor and discuss each other's thoughts. Each child excitedly offered their ideas, and a few pairs argued heatedly. Once the conversations died down, I asked them to share their thoughts with the whole class. After a few comments, one child, in the back of the room said, "It's all about perspective. Don't you see? Each character sees the same event in a different way." The other children nodded solemnly, and the teacher and I exchanged a thrilled look. One child said, "I could write a story like that. I know, you could read it when you come back."

Barbara Waxman is an Expeditionary Learning school designer in based in Seattle, Washington.


Book Review: Literacy with an Attitude


by Patrick Finn
Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999

By Roslyn Blache

Can it be true that we Texas educators are not educating students to be literate? Are we not empowering students to be lifelong learners? Are we widening the gap between those who have power and those who are seeking to obtain it? The 2000 RAND study of Texas education found that the gap between black and white students' literacy has increased from 1994-1998. One possible cause is the pressure to raise test scores. Teachers in low-performing schools report spending more time on test preparation than teachers in high performing schools. Often, these low-performing schools include large populations of low-income and minority students. Seeking some answers to this perplexing situation, I began reading Literacy with an Attitude.

In his book, Finn asserts there are two kinds of literacy education available in schools today. First, there is empowering education, which leads to powerful literacy, the kind of literacy that leads to positions of power and authority. Second, there is domesticating education, which leads to functional literacy, literacy that makes a person productive and dependable, but not troublesome. It is this second kind of education, Finn believes, that is fostered upon the working class, and to some extent, the middle class.

Working class children are denied access to powerful literacy because powerful literacy can assist the disenfranchised in their struggle for justice. Finn arrives at this conclusion after considering his own background as a working class child, and judging his own teaching and the teaching of his colleagues in New York. He realized that those teachers who were deemed successful were those who were teaching students to do as they were told, not teaching students to think. After researching the work of Paulo Freire, a professor at the University of Recife (Brazil), Finn understood that powerful literacy for the working class would be dangerous to the status quo.

Finn turns to Jean Anyon's study of schools in northern New Jersey to see how schools distribute powerful literacy. Anyon found in the schools she studied that education could be classified into four distinct categories: executive elite, affluent professional, middle class and working class. The two that were most disparate were, of course, the executive elite and the working class.

These two categories had their own identifiable teaching strategies. The majority of teachers working with working class students presented segmented facts and made little attempt to connect these facts to students' lives, environment, or broader context. Students learned that following prescribed steps was more important than whether the answers were right or wrong, and they were rarely allowed to participate in lessons that required them to evaluate anything or make decisions.

In contrast, knowledge in the executive elite school was academic, intellectual, and rigorous. Teachers taught more difficult concepts and valued reasoning and problem solving. These schools held up the rationality and logic of mathematics as the model for correct and ethical thinking. Lessons geared to understanding the students' environment, the economy, and other essential systems were an integral part of the learning. A direct correlation could be made between the skill and habits these students were expected to achieve and the strategies their teachers employed to teach them.

If this all sounds hopeless, do not despair. Finn assures that educators can use strategies to address these deficiencies and help students acquire the most powerful form of literacy. Finn discusses four levels of literacy. The lowest level, "performance level," is the ability to "sound out" words and turn sentences that are typical informal face-to-face conversation into writing. The second level, or "functional level," is when the students demonstrate the ability to meet the reading and writing demands of an average day of an average person. The next level is the "informational level," the ability to read and absorb the kind of knowledge that is associated with the school-writing reports, examinations. The highest level of literacy, "powerful literacy," involves creativity and reason-the ability to evaluate, analyze, and synthesize what is read. Powerful literacy, if utilized, can become a tool for liberation and justice for all students. Consider the use of the essay, the writings of Ghandi, the speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr.

Patrick Finn believes we can educate all students for "powerful literacy." Literacy with an Attitude has several directives that could bring justice to our schools. He suggests that students need authentic experiences that are challenging, focused on issues of concern in their communities, utilize their creativity, are geared to their interests, include time to reflect, include time to critique their work, and requires them to use their initiative and inquisitiveness. The community and parents need to collaborate to insure that all students are educated for powerful literacy. Does any of this sound familiar? If you work in an Expeditionary Learning school, these should all be goals you are working toward and/or are achieving already.

Roslyn Blache is an Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound school designer based in San Antonio, Texas.


The Fieldwork Archive