Volume VlII, Issue No.3
March 1,2000
In
This Issue: Fieldwork
Bringing Fieldwork Back to the
Classroom
By Colleen Broderick
We sat in a circle, eyes puffy from crying. I gazed intently
at each student, and each matched my gaze with equal confidence
and intensity. I knew students had been transformed by the week's
experience on the Navajo reservation in Window Rock, Arizona. Not
only could they articulate Navajo philosophical foundations, creation
myths, and contemporary Navajo governance structure (an amount of
knowledge I would struggle to communicate during a month in the
classroom), they also had confronted their own identities openly
and honestly. What would happen once we returned to school? Would
this deliberate consciousness remain? How could I help these kids
keep what they found? -Personal Journal entry
In many respects, the crew trip to the Navajo reservation during
the spring of 1999 with 13 high school students and my colleague
Randy Zimmerman changed my conception of fieldwork. Being on the
reservation obviously made a big impact on the students, but I found
it hard to sustain their learning once we returned to class at the
Rocky Mountain School of Expeditionary Learning, in Denver. The
trip revealed the strengths and weaknesses of how we as a high school
teaching team choose fieldwork, facilitate it, and foster its transference
once we return. When I realized that we had never fully tapped the
Navajo trip's potential, I knew I had to apply the lessons I learned
from it to future fieldwork experiences.
Untapped Potential
My journey to improve how I use fieldwork included multiple stages,
but one of the most important was reflecting on what did and didn't
work on the trip to the Navajo reservation. The fieldwork was designed
as an immersion into the notion of creation, both of a culture and
of individuals. Students were continually challenged to ask themselves,
Who am I? The trip also provided direct interaction with people
and settings that were completely out of their realm of experience.
They did a service project of making repairs on the clan site of
our guide, Phil Bluehouse, and in the evenings, we gathered in Phil's
hogan, an octagonal, Navajo house, for long discussions. The trip
called on students to stretch beyond their comfort zones, and obviously
touched them very deeply, yet in the end, so much of the tipi's
potential remained unmined. It was like reading a good novel without
analyzing or interpreting its meaning. Despite the powerful impact
students felt on the reservation, the trip lacked the level of transference
back to the classroom that I hoped for. The fieldwork was intended
as a crew trip and was loosely tied to the high school expedition
on the American Dream. Only 13 students went to the reservation,
so when students returned to class, the impact of the trip began
to fade. Commitments they made during the trip waned without the
structures to support them. They also had no opportunity to do anything
with the knowledge they had gained. The trip itself was successful,
but as a teacher, I wanted to look more closely at how I could consciously
plan rich fieldwork without leaving the results to luck.
Through personal research and a graduate class in Experiential
Education with Richard Kraft, I learned numerous fieldwork techniques
I was eager to implement. Many of the techniques I began to explore
stemmed from the work of Michael Gass, coordinator of the Outdoor
Education Program at the University of New Hampshire and chair of
the Department of Kinesiology. Briefly, these techniques include:
designing conditions for transfer before the experience actually
begins; creating elements in class similar to those students will
see in the field; providing means for students to internalize their
own learning; placing more responsibility for learning with the
students; and developing processing techniques that foster the transfer
of learning back in the classroom.
Through my research, I began to realize that I could plan fieldwork
in the same manner that I plan a class. For example, just as I establish
learning goals and expectations in the classroom, I could do the
same in the field. For some reason, this felt like a huge epiphany.
I am fairly new at integrating fieldwork, and this parallel to planning
instruction for the classroom provided me with concrete steps I
could take when implementing field experiences. I began to articulate
more clearly the objectives of a trip beforehand and thought about
how I would provide opportunities for students to demonstrate their
learning during and after the trip.
New Strategies
Spring provided the high school team with our next opportunity to
plan fieldwork. We were continuing with our whole-high-school expedition
on the American Dream, and as we began identifying fieldwork opportunities,
the process reminded me of choosing a novel, a math problem, or
any other resource that helps students construct understanding of
a concept. We decided to build our fieldwork around a single question
that Pablo Stayton, RMSEL's Spanish teacher, had begun to explore
in Spanish: What is the cost of the American Dream? Both Pablo and
I agreed that the border region between El Paso, Texas and Juarez,
Mexico, would provide a rich opportunity for authentic inquiry.
Creating a specific question for the fieldwork enabled us to plan
for the transference before the trip began. It also empowered students
to use the information as they were experiencing it.
The preparation for the five-day trip was extensive, both behind
the scenes and in the classroom. Karin Krauth-Strayton, our trip
coordinator, began arranging opportunities in the two cities that
would bring students into contact with people, not agencies. In
the classroom, students explored the issues they would encounter
on the border through readings, small group discussions, and Socratic
seminars. The readings ranged from articles from the El Paso newspaper
and the New York Times, to descriptions of the physical conditions
on the border, to an academic analysis of the economic conditions.
Students also participated in activities exploring stereotypes and
culture. By the time we headed to El Paso, students had already
began to formulate theories concerning the issues of the border.
Once on site, students toured the colonias in El Paso, helped with
a service project at a church in Juarez, worked with elementary
school children in the Juarez schools, shared a meal with migrant
farm workers, met with lawyers, and prepared a meal for Dr. Mendoza,
a missionary doctor in Mexico. Students also attended presentations
at the border control, La Mujer Obreras (an organization that supports
the rights of women workers in the textile factories), and the detention
center for undocumented juveniles.
Upon reflection, I had realized that during the Navajo trip we
could have used debriefs more purposefully. So in El Paso, we had
very specific debriefs and evening activities that helped students
make sense of their experiences and to connect their experiences
from day to day. For example, after a day touring the maquiladoras,
or factories with substandard conditions, students voiced confusion
about economic conditions in Mexico. They wanted to blame the maquiladoras
for perpetuating the poverty in the city. In anticipation of this
confusion, that evening's activity included a role-play that traced
the historical events and economic forces that had created the present
conditions.
Another strength of the El Paso/Juarez trip was that we used similar
rituals that students were familiar with in school. Every morning
began with a circle that was similar to the community meetings that
we had every morning at RMSEL. Like the community meeting, I shared
a reading or a quotation for the day that was intended to guide
our thinking. These rituals provided a structure so that students
seemed centered when they moved on to their day.
Bringing the Fieldwork Home
The greatest difference between the two trips became apparent once
we returned to school. Unlike the Navajo trip, the entire high school
participated in the Juarez experience, so we were more conscious
of putting structures in place to help students transfer what they
experienced. The final project for the expedition was an art exhibit
at a local gallery. The objective was to enable students to highlight
their understanding of the American Dream as a result of their research,
their novel study, and their experience on the border. To help students
mine their experiences, we created "word murals" of their trip.
On a huge piece of paper labeled with a specific experience, such
as the border control or the Mexican elementary school, or people
that students interviewed, they began to brainstorm all they could
recall, including facts, smells, sounds, visual observations, specific
quotations, and original conclusions. After 15 minutes, students
rotated to a different group, adding a different element. By hanging
the murals and discussing their content, we were able to compare
observations and question various conclusions. The murals also helped
the class revisit the guiding questions and the trip question. We
had created a text of our experience, so students could easily refer
to and compare what they had learned before the trip, during the
trip, and after they returned.
Unlike other fieldwork experiences that I have participated in,
the border trip's impact has endured. The follow-through activities
and the art show helped us sustain the border trip by providing
something concrete that we can still refer to in our present expedition
on the San Luis Valley, a predominately Mexican-American region
in Colorado. The San Luis expedition explores culture and story,
and we have been able to build on the students' understanding by
referring to the border fieldwork for examples and analogies. Recently,
we welcomed back a senior who continued her exploration of the border
on her independent senior expedition.
Without a doubt, the transfer of field learning is difficult, and
it is something our high school teaching team is still experimenting
with. The preparation and strategies we used on the Juarez trip
seemed to help the students deepen their understanding of the expedition's
ideas and questions. Nonetheless, I find myself still reflecting
on the Navajo trip. I am confident that students were transformed
while on the trip, but I only wish I could have helped students
sustain the results longer. During one of our evening discussions
in a hogan on the reservation, I asked our guide Phil Bluehouse
how people keep a vision alive, and he told me you need to repeatedly
articulate the experience. In a sense, that is what we have done
since we returned from Juarez, and it has indeed kept our learning
alive.
Colleen Broderick is a teacher at the Rocky Mountain School
for Expeditionary Learning in Denver, Colorado.
back to In This Issue
Is Fieldwork a Reward?
By Meg Campbell
While visiting different expeditionary learning schools recently,
I asked about the extent of fieldwork undertaken by students. In
some schools, I was told fieldwork is a privilege that must be earned
by students; only certain students "get" to participate. In my understanding,
it seemed like the "good students" conducted fieldwork and the "troublemakers"
stayed back in class. I wondered if the students felt quarantined,
punished, or indifferent. It was hard to imagine those left behind
feeling very engaged.
Might there be a different way to think about fieldwork?
What if we were to place fieldwork on a par with books? I revere
books and their potential for opening new worlds of understanding.
I know there is a long history of struggle for the universal right
to learn to read and write, but it is a struggle that I hope has
been won in our schools. Learning to read and write is a right;
it need not be earned. Every student has access to books.
If reading a text together is a central part of a learning expedition,
then fieldwork, which is reading a different kind of "text" together,
must also be central. I believe it is often the students who are
"kept behind" who may need the intellectual nourishment of field
experiences more than any other students in the class. For what
does going out and exploring do? It fosters curiosity, imagination,
wonder, and observation skills. It provides a feast to reflect upon.
Learning is chewing ideas and taking some in, and frankly, spitting
some out. It is mind work, but it must be fed by experience and
by guided reflection on that experience. "But you don't know the
population of students we have!" I can hear someone counter. Lisa
Delpit, in Other's People Children (New York: The New Press, 1995)
, challenges us to view every student as if he or she were our own
child. Looking at how we organize fieldwork is a compelling indicator
of whether or not we view students as our own children. Are we hungry
for our students to have a wide range of field experiences, or is
fieldwork tacked on as a reward?
We can all cite horror stories from the field, but we can also
cite instances when those same students have "risen to the occasion"
when invited to a nice restaurant or to teacher's home, for example.
Students generally reflect what's expected as appropriate behavior;
if they have learned either bad habits or no habits about pursuing
their education beyond classroom walls, then it is not surprising
that the revert to inappropriate behavior. We have to work hard
at building the necessary skills and putting learning first.
Just as in an Outward Bound wilderness course, our success is defined
by our group's ability to ensure that we all reach the summit; we
do not leave someone behind. Crew members are more likely to take
responsibility for each other if success of the expedition depends
on everyone's participation. We know that it is extra work for all
of us, but we believe it is so important that we will ask every
student to participate and, if necessary, we will defer until we
are all ready to go.
If viewed as a core purpose of education, fieldwork is valued and
organized differently in a school. Fieldwork becomes a given and
a priority. We invest precious time at the beginning of the expedition
to clarify and work together on the habits that will be necessary
for us to conduct any fieldwork in our crews. We use fieldwork as
a powerful motivator to tackle project work in the learning expedition.
According to Mike McCarthy, principal of King Middle School in
Portland, Maine, "We view fieldwork as an essential part of the
learning expedition. Small heterogeneous groups might go out for
parts of the investigation, but for the whole class part, we add
supervision rather than subtract students. We call parents-and they
hear the desperation in our voices-and tell them the truth: We need
you. We can't take the students to the field site without you. Will
you help us? Parents respond, even parents who may traditionally
not have been active as school volunteers."
Traditional schooling is a very sedentary experience. Experience
helps crack open schooling to wider and deeper learning, but field
experience alone does not guarantee learning. If it is not followed
up with time for guided reflection, much of the opportunity for
deeper learning is lost. There can be schools where students flit
from field experience to field experience without any purposeful
reflection or creation of original work based on their field experience.
This is not mind-nourishing either.
We call it fieldwork because it is work. It should be hard and
demanding. Going out, we should learn things that we could not learn
so fully if we had stayed in our seats. We always go out with a
question we want to answer. Generating these questions ahead of
time is an important part of scaffolding for effective fieldwork.
Yes, we have guiding questions, but we also have individual student
questions. What am I looking for? What am I interested in learning
about?
As students explore cyberspace more and more, the physical need
to go outside and explore the real world will grow more precious,
not decrease. It is quite an astonishing marvel to see a late nineteenth-century,
Northern Cheyenne quill mask for a horse (www.si.edu/nmai/) on a
screen, but it is not the same thing as standing before the object
at the National Museum of the American Indian in New York City in
real life. Yes, let us explore cyperspace's riches, but let us not
shortchange what is there for the discovering when we go outside
with our questions with students.
Meg Campbell is the director of program development for Expeditionary
Learning Outward Bound.
back to In This Issue
A
Glass Window onto the Community
By Carla Rowdy
Four years ago, I was a relatively new high school teacher with
classroom management as my weakest area. I needed to make learning
fun, safe, and challenging. With tremendous support from Cross Creek
School's administration, I used my passion for making stained glass
as a link between my students, environmental studies, and the outside
community. Asking students to make beautiful glass pieces for the
community became a hook for them to learn an art form and a skilled
trade-as well as all the science and language arts they needed to
support it.
Four years later, we now operate the only stained glass and mosaic
production company in our Pompano Beach, Florida school system.
Students produce Tiffany-style glass pieces on commission and for
general sale. They cut glass, use high temperature soldering irons,
work with acids, and create incredible pieces of artwork through
the physical conundrum of glass. We visit several glass shops to
compare prices, purchase supplies, and meet with glass artists.
I provide the seed money, but then the classes become self-sufficient.
Students work off a profit and loss balance sheet, with profits
going toward the purchase of their own personal glass tools. Students
who learn to produce high quality work on an independent basis take
their equipment home and start their own businesses. Currently,
we have five students who are independent partners.
Glass projects have become a central part of the learning expeditions
I do. This year, we have been working on an expedition on Florida's
endangered species. Our goal is to produce a guide to the endangered
ferns at a local nature preserve, Fern Forest. Students need to
be able to identify a fern and its species, complete a technical
rendering of the fern frond, include research material on the habitat,
size, and characteristics, and publish the guide.
As an additional project in the expedition, students have created
mosaic stepping stones and flowerpots with the fern motif. Where
stained glass requires precision cutting, grinding, and using a
soldering iron and acids, mosaic work only requires pieces of glass
adhered to a base and grouted. Students who have trouble writing
about a fern build confidence by creating a tile, stone, or pot.
They have to read about the particular fern and convert an actual
frond or photo into a pattern. Using math skills, they estimate
the amount of area that will be covered in glass, how much glass
is needed, what quantity of glue to use, and the ratio of grout
to water. They also have to figure out the costs of every phase
of construction. They end up using language arts, science and art
skills throughout the project.
Most of the students at our school struggle with emotional or behavioral
disabilities. Time and again, I watch as the glass projects hook
students who were turned off by typical assignments. I knew, for
instance, that Matt found reading and writing challenging, but I
did not know he had a hidden talent. For his research project, he
chose the squid, and on a whim, I asked if he could draw a squid.
From a student who had earned the worst behavioral reputation at
school, this young man sat still for 90 minutes each day for two
weeks to get his drawing perfect. During his research phase, he
asked our class volunteer, Ms. Riedle, to sit with him and spell
words while he typed them into a PowerPoint presentation that was
excellent. He entered his drawing into a local Marine Science Fair
and won a 3rd place ribbon out of l3OO juried exhibits.
Matt's self esteem got a serious boost as his peers started asking
for his help in making patterns for the glass designs of other species.
He has parlayed his talents into the glass production company and
has created some incredible stepping stones from his drawing. Now,
are all his problems solved? No, Matt still works on his behavior,
but he found one way to make his science education engaging.
A good student, Guido works hard at trying to keep up with the
work and ignore the inappropriate behavior of his peers. The mosaic
stepping stones were a natural way for him to complete his assignment
and learn a trade. He solicited Matt to help make bird patterns
for an environmental fair we were attending where six students were
selling their mosaic bird stepping stones. Guido was able to sell
enough stones to earn his own personal stained glass equipment.
Guido also joined us at two private houses where the glass company
was installing a stepping stone walkway. Students had to measure
and photograph the yard, diagram the arrangements of plant life,
and interview the patron for personal preferences. Students were
charged with returning to the classroom and finalizing designs for
the walkways. For the final step, students presented the patron
with a portfolio of options to choose from for installation. The
very academic skills that were problematic for Guido were the ones
he used in completing this assignment. Plus, he had to assume a
leadership role to mentor novice glass students. He read a variety
of research articles and books on ferns, wrote in a daily observation
journal, used his math estimation skills, and honed his artistic
talents, all while wandering around a patron's fern-covered yard.
So how does glass fit into the science curriculum? Well, if you
were to ask my students, you would get a variety of answers. By
knowing which chemicals need to be combined to produce specific
colors, they can estimate the cost of a sheet of glass. They know
that red and purple glass needs gold, among other chemicals, to
obtain their colors. Because they realize that tremendous heat is
needed to create a fragile sheet of glass, they understand how a
simple carbide wheel will separate the molecules in order to sever
the atomic bonds and cut the sheet. Or they might explain the chemical
bond necessary to have acid and lead adhere to copper, which encases
the glass. They would say all that and much more before they even
started talking about all the aesthetic and visual dramatics of
creating stained glass. Glass science seems to be a creative answer
to reach most of our students' needs in an alternative way. Please
don't burst their bubble by telling them that their glass production
is truly harder than most science projects. All they care about
is that it is fun.
Carla Rowly is a teacher at Cross Creek School in Pompano Beach,
Florida.
back to In This Issue
Guest Speakers as Literacy Development
By Suzanne Plaut, Christina Patterson, and Joe Zaremba
Last fall, 60 seventh-grade students and five teachers from the
Harbor School in Boston set out on a learning expedition called
"Colonial Dreams." We wanted our students to understand the lives
of everyday people, so we asked them to write a biography of a historically
accurate fictional character, draw an architectural rendering of
their character's home, and do a dramatic interpretation or portrait
of their character.
As a Humanities team, we structured reading and writing activities
that would help students understand their colonial character, but
because our students' literacy skills range widely, we turned to
guest lecturers to strengthen students' background knowledge. The
speakers brought to life the descriptive detail, storytelling, and
character development techniques we wanted our students to use in
their own work.
Since some of our students were going to develop Native American
characters, we invited Ms. Caring Hands, a member of the Natick
Praying Indian tribe whose ancestors had been sent to Deer Island
(in the Boston Harbor) to speak. She focused on the culture and
etiquette of her tribe, as well as how her people record and transmit
history. Katrina, who later created a Native American woman named
"Creative Star," says Ms. Caring Hands helped her understand the
reading in her packet of research materials. Katrina later wrote:
She described what her clothes were made of, and gave us Indian
popcorn, which was nasty! She told us how they were in the old times
and that when they killed an animal they stopped to pray. She explained
how the designs on their belts tell a story and that the different
colors meant different things, so when I made my own wampum belt,
I could make up colors that made sense: green tells about the land,
black about the spirit.
In addition to the belt, Ms. Caring Hands showed baskets and other
artifacts that students were reading about in their packets and
would need to incorporate into their scenes or portraits. She sang
songs in her native language and let students drum with her, creating
not only visual but auditory images our students could later access.
For most of our students, Ms. Caring Hands was the first Native
American they had ever met. She kindled the respect for diversity
we strive to foster. Yet she also promoted literacy by connecting
her life to the lives of our students-showing how all cultures have
stories, songs, dances, and ritual-and by giving them a depth of
understanding of another culture to draw on when they began their
research and writing.
An actress from Plymouth Plantation (a museum with historic reenactments)
also came in character as Pilgrim Eleanor Billington, the wife of
John Billington who was a big trouble-maker in the Plymouth Colonies.
Seeing her in full costume of a colonial American, understanding
the way language was spoken back then, again helped students' reading
come off the page. She stayed in character while students asked
questions that came to mind. Since this presenter actually came
two weeks before we went to the plantation, she served as a sort
of pre-reading for the fieldwork itself. Students knew what to look
for, and they had done an oral "rough draft" of the kinds of questions
they would later prepare for our actual site visits.
Seeing "Mrs. Billington" also gave students a benchmark about how
to embed historical facts in a presentation-about what their character
eats, how he or she dresses, what he or she believes in-into both
their written biography and their dramatic interpretation. In addition,
she made reading and writing from a particular perspective real.
She stepped into a life while sticking to history.
When the actress finally broke character, our students were stunned.
One asked, "Why can you tell me how to spell that word now, but
five minutes ago when I asked you, you said you didn't know?" She
responded simply, "Before, I was in character. In the 1600's, Mrs.
Billington would not have known how to read or write." In addition,
her comments (along with those of Ms. Caring Hands) injected other
issues related to literacy that we planned to return to later: how
did different cultures and classes make sense of the world in the
colonial era? Did they use song or speech or writing to tell their
story?
She explicitly addressed our guiding question: "What do I need
to know and do to be a good researcher?" She discussed how she used
primary sources and other documents to develop her scene, and how
she determined what information was essential. Our students already
knew they would be reading to find information about their character's
"Five C's": color, class, context, culture, and character. Here,
they saw that this actress had not only gone through the same steps,
but also had synthesized that information in a flesh-and-blood dramatic
interpretation. Thus, they saw in the research we were asking them
to do the reading and writing tasks actual historians and performers
do as adults.
Suzanne Plaut, Christina Patterson, and Joe Zaremba are teachers
at the Harbor School in Dorchester, Massachusetts.
back to In This Issue
Teachers Find Service Just Outside School Doors
By Laura Flaxman
Early on an August morning, a group of teachers walked tentatively
into the Claddagh Inn, a food pantry and soup kitchen in the Rockaway
Beach section of Queens, New York. It was the first day of the summer
institute for the Active Learning Prep School (ALSP), an expeditionary
learning school-within-a-school located in Rockaway Beach. The school
had identified the need to use more community resources in the curriculum,
but in order to know how to link expeditions to the community, the
teachers needed to know what opportunities lay outside their school
doors. They decided the best way to find out was to make the time
as a whole staff to plunge right in.
The group stepped inside a small building covered from floor to
ceiling with boxes of donated food and other goods. Teachers were
greeted by Mrs. Jones, the woman responsible for making sure that
the hundreds of people who came every day got hot meals and bags
of groceries. After a tour of the place, including the kitchen where
vast quantities of food were being prepared, and the vegetable garden
outside, the teachers signed up for tasks. Some helped in the kitchen,
some rearranged the boxes, and some distributed meals and food.
The next couple of hours flew by as a seemingly endless stream of
people passed through the doors and out again, laden with aromatic
containers and grocery bags.
At the end of the day, when the faculty got together to reflect
on their experiences, people were visibly moved. Several spoke of
never having done anything like that before in their lives and how
affected they were personally. By the end of the week, the faculty
worked at transferring the experience from the personal realm to
the professional, so that the power of what they had experienced
could be shared with students. One result was that the school has
developed a relationship with the Claddagh Inn and students offer
their service there throughout the year.
If expeditionary learning is about the power of experience, it
makes sense that adult learning would parallel student learning,
and that both would benefit from learning by doing. Pat Tubridy,
the principal at ALPS, said having the faculty experience the power
of service for themselves was the most influential factor in making
service a priority in the school. The time the teachers spent at
the Claddagh Inn introduced them not only to the possibilities of
service, but also to the fact that learning opportunities await
them in places they pass by every day.
Laura Flaxman is an Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound school
designer.
Back to In This Issue
The Fieldwork Archive
|