Volume VII, Issue No.1
January 1, 1999
In This Issue: Documenting Student Work
Our Practice: Inside
the Expeditionary Learning Classroom
Lessons
of the Reggio Approach Part II: Why Document?
Story Making in the
Classroom
The Never Ending Line:
Part II
Resources on Documenting
Student Work
Our
Practice: Inside the Expeditionary Learning Classroom
By Jeanne Anderson and Karen Wohlwend
Our use of transcripts in the classroom
stems from a desire to record a window into the childis world. We
first encountered transcripts during a state early childhood conference.
During a session on the Reggio Emilia philosophy, we were struck
by the depth of language that children use as they construct new
knowledge. Teachers were closely watching and recording preschoolersi
actions, processes, and thoughts as they worked on complex projects.
We were fascinated by the focus on the child and the respect for
their work and abilities. We were inspired to adapt these techniques
for use in our expeditions.
At first, we used the transcripts
as a means for communicating with parents, to give them a peek into
the childis day. As we began to do more and more recording, we saw
the value of in-depth documentation. Expedition vocabulary and concepts
were evident in the conversations between children and in self-talk.
We then added transcripts as a checkpoint along the way; for reflecting
on what we had learned and to summarize important information in
a group setting. The transcripts show not only the extent of vocabulary
and depth of knowledge but show how all members of the community
make a contribution.
[This article is incomplete.]
back to In This
Issue
Lessons
of the Reggio Approach Part II: Why Document?
By Amy Mednick
This article is based primarily on lectures by Brenda Fyfe and Lella
Gandini given at the conference
In the entryways to the early childhood
centers in Reggio Emilia, Italy, calendars announce scheduled activities
and projected curriculum for each of the classrooms. Next to the
calendars, teachers post descriptions of what actually happened
in the classroom. Accompanying excerpts from journals might explain,
for example, the teacheris thinking about how a certain project
evolved based on childrenis interests. Through this displaya
first encounter with the school for community visitors or parentsthe
school community explains not only practical information, but meaningful
examples of how teachers approach learning in the school.
For Reggio educators, documentation
is more than just an informational bulletin board or display of
lovely student work because it explains the depth of the childis
thinking and learning and provokes participation by the audience.
Documentation is a working tool that helps Reggio teachers develop
flexible, yet comprehensive curriculum plans that are respectful
of children, said Lella Gandini, liaison for Reggio Children in
the United States. Rather than a suitcase full of papers or photographs,
documentation is selected, organized, and treated as records to
revisit, and as important experiences and observations to study
and analyze, reports Brenda Fyfe, professor of education at Webster
State University in St. Louis, Missouri. Teachers come up with projected
plans based on their interpretation of the childrenis interest and
then record the childrenis activities, through extended or brief
notes, slides, photographs, videotaping, or tape recording. They
then share the recorded information with the children to push them
to revisit the experience, and analyze it with their colleagues.
Then, after reaching a consensus of interpretations, they revise
the plans. So, there is a cyclical nature in the way documentation
generates projected plans, and vice versa.
Examples of documentation panels,
integral to the Reggio approach, are seen throughout Reggio centers
being discovered and pored over by groups of children, faculty members,
or parents. The panels are finely designed display boards using
inexpensive materials such as photos, student work, text of childrenis
conversations, and meaningful explanation (see box Elements of a
Panel). Because of the broad role of documentation, the product
is not always formal and might serve simply to further understanding
of a situation, with varying detail, depending on the audience.
Inviting Parent and Community Awareness
Displaying panels of documentation
is a substantive way for teachers to communicate to the childrenis
family what happens in school. The documentation, which could be
a portfolio of student work or a display of one studentis work representative
of the entire class, acts as a tool to help move parents from involvement
to intellectual partnership, Fyfe said. In the panels, teachers
unveil the process and thinking behind what the children are learning.
Rather than the teacher acting as
the expert imparting information about the curriculum, parents and
teachers begin to work together for individual children and for
the classroom community as a whole. For example, in much the same
way Reggio teaching teams work, teachers might share a documentation
panel with a group of parents and then ask them to think about how
to move the project forward. In some cases, a family might remember
their child mentioning something about the project at home, which
could lead to a next step, according to Fyfe. Parents can also contribute
to the classroom through helping with tape recording, taking notes,
or transcribing for documentation projects.
The Reggio system also views documentation
as an important way to give the community at large, which funds
the early childhood centers, a view into the classroom. In Reggio
schools, teachers realize that the families bring aspects of the
community into school with them and so the community is considered
a vital part of the school, and educators are committed to relating
what is happening in the centers to the wider community. The documentation
panels create an archive of the history of the school and of the
joy in learning passed down from one class to another.
Observing and Understanding Children
In order to begin documenting a classroom
experience, the teacher must observe the children and listen carefully
to their conversations. In one example of a documented project,
five-year-old children were corresponding with a preschool in Washington
D.C. by fax. The teacher noticed that the children wondered how
these letters could have arrived by fax at the local tobacco store.
Over an extended time period, the children began discussing their
theories, including one in which a bird transported the fax across
the ocean. Each child drew a picture of his or her own idea, and
then they had more conversations. But the children liked best the
theory that a plastic pipe had transported the fax through Italy,
around a tree, through the ocean, past an island and the Statue
of Liberty, to Washington D.C. As a group, the class did a large
drawing of this image and then took the time to create a model of
it.
In cases like the one above, the teacher,
whose role is of participant-observer and researcher, does not simply
rely on her memories. She observes as she takes notes, tape records
and/or takes photographs, and then later can go back to those records
of conversations, and interpret them. Each tool used has its own
potential and limitation. For example, the photographer must decide
on which child to focus. Using a variety of media helps overcome
those biases. The teaching team then reviews the transcript or notes
on the conversation and the photographs, and brings their view of
the most important points to a group of teachers. Picking photographs,
Gandini said, is often particularly difficult. While it is important
to narrow down the selection, Reggio teachers often place the photographs
that were not selected in a transparent pocket available for those
interested in more detail. As teachers revisit the conversations
and activities of the children, the team gains new insights into
what the children were thinking at the time and reach new levels
of understanding. Observations, looking at records, and interpreting
them with other teachers allow them to hypothesize about childrenis
learning processes and desires, and are all important to help design
a curriculum that is
back to In This
Issue
Story
Making in the Classroom
By Mara Lise Esposito
I find myself in need of educational
documentation and assessment tools that speak to the unique strengths,
needs, interests, and diversity found among the infinite combinations
of individuals which comprise my first- and second-grade classroom.
How might story devices document and articulate curriculum in a
manner that meets the academic and social needs of the students?
I have just started responding to these questions in my teaching
and my path into the questioning is through story.
Last year, my students and I read
many legends and stories about and by Native Americans, primarily
Northwest coastal but including some Plains and Southwest Native
stories. Sitting in front of a blank wall, we collectively fleshed
out the physical landscape. In more than 15 books, we had read about
mountains, volcanoes, rivers, caves, deserts, etc. As the children
rapidly poured forth the landscape, I wrote the words on small strips
of paper and they attached them to the wall. We repeated the process
for characters and objects: Clamshell Boy, Little Firefly, Cloud
Eater, Jumping Mouse, Basket Woman . . . fire sticks, berries, baskets,
the four directions, rocks, and feathers. The children began drawing
and cutting out pictorial representations of the word labels they
saw, and taping them in between and around the words. The whole
process for this initial stage lasted nearly all of the afternoon.
Soon characters and objects from many settings were nestled side
by side, looking at one another. No matter that there were easily
a half dozen more Bumblebee Sisters buzzing around the paper hive
than there had been in the original story, or that several Grandmother
Suns shone down from just below the ceiling. Every child had taken
part in the creation of our wall.
As the year evolved, our notion of
what constituted
back to In This
Issue
The
Never Ending Line: Part II
By Steven Levy
In Part I, published in the December 1998 Web, Steven Levy wondered
aloud how he could do away with the "never ending line" of students
in front of his desk. He explored the process of establishing standards
of quality that guided the studentsi work throughout the year, using
the example of drawing a straight line and guiding them through
a set of steps from the intial assignment to the final assessment.
In this article, the students use the same process to develop standards
for a writing assignment and a long-range project.
Experience
Two students discovered a trap door
under the carpet in our room. We managed to pry off the lid (using
the principle of the lever which we were studying in simple machines)
and the class was anxious to climb down and explore. I knew I was
going to succumb to the excitement anyway, but I figured I might
as well try to use the experience to promote their learning. I challenged
them to convince me that exploring the trap door would have educational
value before I would let them climb down. They said they would measure
the perimeter of the school (it was a crawl space that went all
around the school).
back to In This
Issue
Resources
on Documenting Student Work
Windows on Learning (includes book,
video, and teacher materials workbook). Inspired by the work of
educators in early childhood centers in Reggio Emilia, Italy, Judy
Harris Helm, Sallee Beneke, and Kathy Steinheimer have put together
a practical approach to documenting what happens in school. Based
on their own experiences working with teachers and children in schools
and early childhood centers throughout Illinois, the authors have
compiled a useful set of tools, including a book, video, and workbook
of teacher materials. While the book is geared toward young children
and the examples are mainly from early childhood centers, many elements
of its straight forward approach are applicable to documenting project
work at any age level.
The first part of the book Windows
on LearningDocumenting Young Childrenis Work ($19.95) describes
the value of documentation; a framework for deciding what and when
to document; an in-depth account of the types of documentation (such
as portfolios, project narratives, observations of child development,
products, and self-reflections) including samples. In Part II, the
authors explore how to collect, organize, and share documentation
with various audiences, including children, colleagues, parents,
and the community. This section also relates how documenting work
helps teachers learn about their own practice and make decisions
about curriculum and assessment. Part III provides a detailed example
of the documentation of one project.
Teachersi Materials for Documenting
Young Childrenis Work: Using Windows on Learning ($9.95) is a step-by-step
system for documenting student work, including sections on preparation,
documentation, analysis, and presentation.
Windows on Learning: A Framework for
Making Decisions ($40) is a 20-minute video set in a classroom at
the Valeska Hinton Early Childhood Education Center in Peoria, Illinois,
which describes and films the documentation process.
In The Languages of Learning: How
Children Talk, Write, Dance, Draw, and Sing Their Understanding
of the World (1994), Karen Gallas, a first- and second- grade teacher
in Brookline, Massachusetts, documents and describes how careful
attention to children's thinking, and the many ways that children
have of expressing their thinking, theorizing, and understanding,
leads to a rich curriculum in which every child has a respected
voice. Gallas describes her work as a teacher-researcher and the
role of the arts in teaching and learning. This inspiring narrative
is useful for gaining new tools to help children achieve literacy,
new ways to think about learning and creating curriculum, and ways
to document the complexity of classroom life.
All the above resources are published
by Teachers College Press (New York: 1998). To order, call toll-free
800-575-6566 or send a fax to 802-864-7626.
Back to In This
Issue
The
Fieldwork Archive
|